Verdict

Foodnoms: Nutrition Tracker scores 7.7 out of 10 in this guide. Method healthier-v1: weighted blend of 9 data-derived sub-scores; see scoring.md. The record files it for Apple Ecosystem Users — Ideal for those who want a native app that syncs perfectly with iCloud and Health.. It is a weak fit for Android Users — The app is exclusive to Apple platforms..

Who it is for

Apple Ecosystem Users — Ideal for those who want a native app that syncs perfectly with iCloud and Health. Macro Trackers — Perfect for users who need precise control over macro and calorie goals.

Price

Monthly: $5.99.

Yearly: $39.99.

Trial: No explicit free trial mentioned in store data..

What the feature record says

Photo logging is marked available. Quality: good. Coverage: moderate. Usefulness: high. AI meal scanner available in premium tier. Evidence noted: description screenshots

Apple Health is marked available. Quality: excellent. Coverage: strong. Usefulness: high. Bidirectional sync for nutrition and activity. Evidence noted: description web

Macro tracking is marked available. Quality: excellent. Coverage: strong. Usefulness: high. Core feature with detailed breakdown. Evidence noted: description screenshots

Micronutrients is marked available. Quality: good. Coverage: moderate. Usefulness: medium. Available in premium tier. Evidence noted: description

Water tracking is marked available. Quality: good. Coverage: strong. Usefulness: high. Dedicated tracking and widget support. Evidence noted: description screenshots

Workout tracking is marked available. Quality: good. Coverage: moderate. Usefulness: medium. Reads Active Energy from Apple Health. Evidence noted: description

Review themes

Users highly value the native Apple design, seamless iCloud/Health integration, and the absence of intrusive ads, often citing it as a superior alternative to legacy trackers. Some users report sync reliability issues with large databases and frustration regarding repetitive manual logging steps, such as adjusting serving units.

Liked: Native Apple design (15 mentions). Users appreciate the clean, intuitive interface that follows Apple's design language.

Liked: Apple Health integration (12 mentions). Seamless bidirectional data sync with Apple Health is a major highlight.

Disliked: Sync reliability (8 mentions). Users report data sync failures after reaching high entry counts.

Disliked: Logging friction (10 mentions). Excessive tapping required for routine logging tasks like unit changes.

Scores

Overall 7.7/10. Confidence on the record is 0.85.

Accuracy: 8/10. Quality rating of the accuracy feature (5 if unknown).

Pricing value: 7.3/10. 10 - annualised price $39.99/15 (+0.5 if free trial).

Ease of use: 9/10. 5 + 5 x best quality of fast-logging features (AI image/text/audio, barcode).

Feature depth: 9.6/10. Quality-weighted share of tracked features available (excellent 1.0 .. poor 0.2), x1.6, capped at 10.

Beginner friendliness: 9.4/10. 60% easeOfUse + 40% beginner skill-level fit.

User feedback: 8.9/10. Bayesian rating 4.72 (iOS 4.73x7961 + Play 0.00x0, prior 4.3x200) + review stars sentiment +0.30 over 20 reviews.

Maintenance: 8.8/10. Last release 9 days ago (half-life 90d, 70%) + median 10 days between releases (30%).

Traction: 6.5/10. log10 of 7961 total ratings (iOS+Play), 1M ratings = 10.

Coachability: 0/10. Best quality of aiCoach / coachConnection features.

Who should skip it

Skip Foodnoms: Nutrition Tracker if you need Android Users — The app is exclusive to Apple platforms.; Casual Loggers — May feel too manual or tedious for those wanting zero-effort logging..