Verdict

Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet scores 8.4 out of 10 in this guide. Method healthier-v1: weighted blend of 9 data-derived sub-scores; see scoring.md. The record files it for Busy Professionals — Fast logging via photo/voice is ideal for those with limited time.. It is a weak fit for Brand-Loyal Eaters — Limited database for specific branded or restaurant items may frustrate..

Who it is for

Busy Professionals — Fast logging via photo/voice is ideal for those with limited time. Families — Shared subscription and syncing features support household goals. Fasting Enthusiasts — Integrated timers make it easy to combine fasting with calorie tracking.

Price

Monthly: $19.99.

Yearly: $53.99.

Trial: Standard App Store trial terms apply..

What the feature record says

Photo logging is marked available. Quality: good. Coverage: moderate. Usefulness: high. Photo recognition is fast but requires manual verification. Evidence noted: description screenshots

Audio logging is marked available. Quality: good. Coverage: strong. Usefulness: high. Voice-to-text logging is efficient for quick entries. Evidence noted: description screenshots

Text logging is marked available. Quality: excellent. Coverage: strong. Usefulness: high. Smart text recognition is standard. Evidence noted: description screenshots

Apple Health is marked available. Quality: excellent. Coverage: strong. Usefulness: high. Robust sync for activity and steps. Evidence noted: description web

Macro tracking is marked available. Quality: excellent. Coverage: strong. Usefulness: high. Detailed macro breakdown provided. Evidence noted: description screenshots

Micronutrients is marked available. Quality: good. Coverage: moderate. Usefulness: medium. Tracks 20+ nutrients. Evidence noted: description

Review themes

Users appreciate the convenience of AI-powered logging (photo/voice), the family plan value, and the flexibility of calorie ranges. Common frustrations include database gaps for branded/restaurant foods, inconsistent AI accuracy, and bugs when syncing data between family members.

Liked: AI-powered logging (3 mentions). Photo and voice logging features are highly valued for saving time.

Liked: Family plan value (2 mentions). The multi-user subscription is seen as a cost-effective solution for households.

Liked: Calorie range flexibility (1 mentions). The wiggle room in calorie targets helps users feel successful.

Disliked: Database limitations (2 mentions). Users report difficulty finding branded or restaurant-specific nutrition data.

Disliked: AI performance issues (2 mentions). AI occasionally misidentifies foods or alters saved recipe macros unexpectedly.

Disliked: Syncing bugs (2 mentions). Data deletion or overwriting occurs when syncing plans between partners.

Scores

Overall 8.4/10. Confidence on the record is 1.

Accuracy: 4.5/10. Quality rating of the accuracy feature (5 if unknown).

Pricing value: 6.9/10. 10 - annualised price $53.99/15 (+0.5 if free trial).

Ease of use: 10/10. 5 + 5 x best quality of fast-logging features (AI image/text/audio, barcode).

Feature depth: 9.5/10. Quality-weighted share of tracked features available (excellent 1.0 .. poor 0.2), x1.6, capped at 10.

Beginner friendliness: 10/10. 60% easeOfUse + 40% beginner skill-level fit.

User feedback: 9.8/10. Bayesian rating 4.84 (iOS 4.86x24450 + Play 4.84x510108, prior 4.3x200) + review stars sentiment +0.40 over 20 reviews.

Maintenance: 9.3/10. Last release 6 days ago (half-life 90d, 70%) + median 4 days between releases (30%).

Traction: 9.5/10. log10 of 534558 total ratings (iOS+Play), 1M ratings = 10.

Coachability: 4.5/10. Best quality of aiCoach / coachConnection features.

Who should skip it

Skip Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet if you need Brand-Loyal Eaters — Limited database for specific branded or restaurant items may frustrate.; Data Purists — AI-generated macros and occasional database errors may require too much manual correction..