Verdict

AI Calorie Tracker by Eatwise scores 6.5 out of 10 in this guide. Method healthier-v1: weighted blend of 9 data-derived sub-scores; see scoring.md. The record files it for Calorie & Macro Trackers — For individuals who need precise logging of food intake and detailed nutritional breakdowns.. It is a weak fit for Users Needing Human Coaching — Not suitable for individuals seeking direct interaction or personalized guidance from a human coach..

Who it is for

Calorie & Macro Trackers — For individuals who need precise logging of food intake and detailed nutritional breakdowns. Weight Management Seekers — For users focused on losing, gaining, or maintaining weight through consistent tracking and progress visualization. Intermittent Fasting Adherents — For those practicing intermittent fasting who require scheduling, reminders, and integrated tracking. AI-Assisted Dieting — For users who prefer AI-driven recommendations and personalized daily tasks for their dietary goals.

Price

Yearly: $39.99.

Weekly: $4.99.

Trial: No explicit free trial is mentioned in the app description or web research notes for this specific app..

What the feature record says

Photo logging is marked available. Quality: good. Coverage: strong. Usefulness: high. AI-powered food recognition and barcode scanning for logging meals via photos or labels. Evidence noted: screenshots description

Audio logging is marked available. Quality: good. Coverage: moderate. Usefulness: medium. Allows logging meals via voice input, converting speech to food items. Evidence noted: screenshots web

Text logging is marked available. Quality: good. Coverage: strong. Usefulness: high. Users can manually enter food items which are then analyzed by the system for nutritional data. Evidence noted: description web

Macro tracking is marked available. Quality: excellent. Coverage: strong. Usefulness: high. Tracks macronutrients (carbs, protein, fats, fiber) with detailed breakdowns for meals and daily intake. Evidence noted: screenshots description

Micronutrients is marked available. Quality: good. Coverage: moderate. Usefulness: medium. Provides insights into vitamins and minerals intake as part of nutritional analysis. Evidence noted: screenshots description

Water tracking is marked available. Quality: good. Coverage: strong. Usefulness: high. Dedicated feature for logging daily water intake with visual indicators. Evidence noted: screenshots web

Review themes

Users generally find the app helpful for their health journey, contributing to its high overall rating. The core functionality of calorie and macro tracking is appreciated. Several users report critical bugs related to calorie calculation, food identification, and app stability. There are also complaints about a lack of personalization in recipes, insufficient exercise guidance, and unresponsive customer support.

Liked: General Usefulness (1 mentions). Users find the app generally helpful for their health journey.

Disliked: App Bugs (2 mentions). Users report issues with the app freezing, calculator errors, and calendar functionality.

Disliked: Calorie Calculation Inaccuracy (3 mentions). The app is reported to have serious math issues with calorie tracking, not adding up correctly, and inaccurate calorie burn estimates.

Disliked: Food Identification Issues (2 mentions). Users experience problems with the AI scanner and general food identification accuracy.

Scores

Overall 6.5/10. Confidence on the record is 1.

Accuracy: 2/10. Quality rating of the accuracy feature (5 if unknown).

Pricing value: 7.3/10. 10 - annualised price $39.99/15 (+0.5 if free trial).

Ease of use: 9/10. 5 + 5 x best quality of fast-logging features (AI image/text/audio, barcode).

Feature depth: 9.1/10. Quality-weighted share of tracked features available (excellent 1.0 .. poor 0.2), x1.6, capped at 10.

Beginner friendliness: 9.4/10. 60% easeOfUse + 40% beginner skill-level fit.

User feedback: 8.1/10. Bayesian rating 4.60 (iOS 4.73x1892 + Play 4.59x19872, prior 4.3x200) + review stars sentiment +0.50 over 20 reviews.

Maintenance: 4.4/10. Last release 129 days ago (half-life 90d, 70%) + median 19 days between releases (30%).

Traction: 7.2/10. log10 of 21764 total ratings (iOS+Play), 1M ratings = 10.

Coachability: 0/10. Best quality of aiCoach / coachConnection features.

Who should skip it

Skip AI Calorie Tracker by Eatwise if you need Users Needing Human Coaching — Not suitable for individuals seeking direct interaction or personalized guidance from a human coach.; Those Requiring High Accuracy — Users who demand flawless calorie calculation and food identification may be frustrated by reported bugs.; Exercise-Focused Individuals — Lacks comprehensive exercise guidance or advanced workout tracking features beyond basic activity logging..