Skip to main content

EatBeat: Weekly Meal Planner review

EatBeat: Weekly Meal Planner scores 5.8 out of 10 in this guide. Method healthier-v1: weighted blend of 9 data-derived sub-scores; see scoring.md. The record file…

Calorie Tracker Guide · 2026-11-14

Editorial score

5.8/10

Verdict

EatBeat: Weekly Meal Planner scores 5.8 out of 10 in this guide. Method healthier-v1: weighted blend of 9 data-derived sub-scores; see scoring.md. The record files it for Casual Eaters — Individuals who want to track their food and nutrition without strict dieting or intense workout regimens.. It is a weak fit for Serious Athletes — Not suitable for users needing detailed workout tracking, performance metrics, or advanced sports nutrition guidance..

Who it is for

Casual Eaters — Individuals who want to track their food and nutrition without strict dieting or intense workout regimens. Motivation Seekers — Users who benefit from gamified elements like 'Health Points' to stay consistent with healthy eating habits. Nutrient-Curious — Those interested in understanding a broad spectrum of nutrients beyond just calories, protein, fat, and carbs. Meal Planners — Individuals looking for smart meal suggestions and cooking ideas to balance their diet.

Price

Monthly: $4.99.

Yearly: $59.99.

Weekly: $8.99.

Trial: A 7-day trial is offered with the 'EatBeat PRO 1 Month 7d trial' subscription..

What the feature record says

Photo logging is marked available. Quality: good. Coverage: strong. Usefulness: high. Users can snap a photo of their plate for automatic nutrient analysis, a core feature highlighted in the description and screenshots. Evidence noted: description screenshots

Text logging is marked available. Quality: good. Coverage: strong. Usefulness: high. The app allows users to 'log your dish', indicating manual text entry for food items, which is then analyzed. Evidence noted: description

Apple Health is marked available. Quality: good. Coverage: moderate. Usefulness: medium. EatBeat integrates with Apple Health, enabling users to sync their nutrition data. Evidence noted: web

Macro tracking is marked available. Quality: excellent. Coverage: strong. Usefulness: high. The app explicitly tracks protein, fats, and carbs, with detailed breakdowns shown in screenshots. Evidence noted: description screenshots

Micronutrients is marked available. Quality: excellent. Coverage: strong. Usefulness: high. EatBeat goes beyond macros to analyze a wider range of nutrients including sugar, cholesterol, alcohol, and fiber, as stated in the description and shown in screenshots. Evidence noted: description screenshots

Accuracy focus is marked available. Quality: good. Coverage: strong. Usefulness: high. The app claims to be 'backed by science' and provides detailed nutrient analysis for logged foods, including a database of restaurant meals, suggesting a focus on data accuracy. Evidence noted: description screenshots

Review themes

Users appreciate the app's detailed nutrient tracking capabilities, the provision of meal ideas and recipes, and the motivational aspects that encourage healthier eating habits. Some users have reported issues with app synchronization, difficulties changing country settings, and a perceived lack of responsive customer support.

Liked: Nutrient tracking (1 mentions). Users value the ability to see detailed nutrient breakdowns for their food intake.

Liked: Meal ideas/recipes (1 mentions). The app's recipe suggestions are well-received by users.

Liked: Guidance/Motivation (2 mentions). Users find the app helpful for motivation and appreciate the nutritional guidance provided.

Disliked: App bugs/stability (1 mentions). One user reported issues with the app being a day behind in tracking.

Disliked: Localization issues (1 mentions). A user experienced difficulty changing country settings within the app.

Disliked: Customer support (1 mentions). A user inquired about support for technical issues, implying a lack of readily available assistance.

Scores

Overall 5.8/10. Confidence on the record is 0.52.

Accuracy: 8/10. Quality rating of the accuracy feature (5 if unknown).

Pricing value: 6.5/10. 10 - annualised price $59.99/15 (+0.5 if free trial).

Ease of use: 9/10. 5 + 5 x best quality of fast-logging features (AI image/text/audio, barcode).

Feature depth: 6/10. Quality-weighted share of tracked features available (excellent 1.0 .. poor 0.2), x1.6, capped at 10.

Beginner friendliness: 9.4/10. 60% easeOfUse + 40% beginner skill-level fit.

User feedback: 6.4/10. Bayesian rating 4.37 (iOS 4.83x30 + Play 0.00x0, prior 4.3x200) + review stars sentiment +0.67 over 3 reviews.

Maintenance: 8.3/10. Last release 21 days ago (half-life 90d, 70%) + median 9 days between releases (30%).

Traction: 2.5/10. log10 of 30 total ratings (iOS+Play), 1M ratings = 10.

Coachability: 0/10. Best quality of aiCoach / coachConnection features.

Who should skip it

Skip EatBeat: Weekly Meal Planner if you need Serious Athletes — Not suitable for users needing detailed workout tracking, performance metrics, or advanced sports nutrition guidance.; Weight Loss Focus — While it tracks calories, it lacks explicit weight tracking or advanced features for aggressive weight management.; Intermittent Fasters — The app does not offer specific tools or tracking for fasting protocols..

Send a correction if a price, feature, or verdict on this page is wrong. It is emailed privately and is not published.