Calorie Tracker Guide · 2026-11-14
Editorial score
5.8/10
Verdict
Calz - Calorie Counter AI scores 5.8 out of 10 in this guide. Method healthier-v1: weighted blend of 9 data-derived sub-scores; see scoring.md.
Who it is for
The record does not name a best-fit group.
Price
Yearly: $14.99.
Trial: Description mentions a free trial..
What the feature record says
Macro tracking is marked available. Quality: fair. Coverage: moderate. Usefulness: medium. Mentioned in the App Store description. Evidence noted: description
Review themes
Review themes are not in this record.
Scores
Overall 5.8/10. Confidence on the record is 1.
Accuracy: 5/10. Quality rating of the accuracy feature (5 if unknown).
Pricing value: 9.5/10. 10 - annualised price $14.99/15 (+0.5 if free trial).
Ease of use: 5/10. 5 + 5 x best quality of fast-logging features (AI image/text/audio, barcode).
Feature depth: 1.1/10. Quality-weighted share of tracked features available (excellent 1.0 .. poor 0.2), x1.6, capped at 10.
Beginner friendliness: 7/10. 60% easeOfUse + 40% beginner skill-level fit.
User feedback: 8.3/10. Bayesian rating 4.65 (iOS 4.65x4401 + Play 4.65x183720, prior 4.3x200) + review stars sentiment +0.20 over 20 reviews.
Maintenance: 9.5/10. Last release 0 days ago (half-life 90d, 70%) + median 6 days between releases (30%).
Traction: 8.8/10. log10 of 188121 total ratings (iOS+Play), 1M ratings = 10.
Coachability: 0/10. Best quality of aiCoach / coachConnection features.
Who should skip it
The record does not name a group that should skip Calz - Calorie Counter AI. Absence is not a recommendation.