Skip to main content

Intermittent Fasting Tracker ⋆ vs MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker

At a glance

Key facts for both apps
Attribute
SubtitleCalorie Tracker & Weight LossFood Macros Calorie Counter
DeveloperLeap Health Fitness LimitedMacrosFirst, Inc.
App Store rating4.91 (27854 reviews)4.86 (13195 reviews)
PricingFree · 10 in-app purchase option(s)Free · 4 in-app purchase option(s)
TrialNo explicit free trial mentioned in store data.Standard App Store trial terms apply.

Pricing & trial

Pricing comparison
Attribute
SummaryFree · 10 in-app purchase option(s)Free · 4 in-app purchase option(s)
TrialNo explicit free trial mentioned in store data.Standard App Store trial terms apply.

Who each app suits best

Intermittent Fasting Tracker ⋆

  • Beginner Fasters — Simple interface and educational content make it easy to start.
  • Visual Trackers — Excellent charts and body status visualizations for progress monitoring.

MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker

Feature checklist

Coverage from our catalog flags. Values are editorial signals, not a guarantee of every device build.

Guide scores

Editorial model scores on our scale — distinct from star ratings in app stores.

Guide score comparison by criterion
Criterion
Overall
Accuracy
Beginner Friendliness
Coachability
Ease Of Use
Feature Depth
Pricing Value
User Feedback

Review themes

Short synthesis of what users often praise or criticize — not a substitute for reading recent reviews yourself.

Highlights users liked

Intermittent Fasting Tracker ⋆

User Interface; Fasting Flexibility

MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker

Free barcode scanner; Clean, intuitive UI

Common complaints

Intermittent Fasting Tracker ⋆

Apple Health Sync; Water Logging

MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker

Search engine quality; Missing water tracking

Bottom line

For most people prioritising overall polish and scores in our dataset, Intermittent Fasting Tracker ⋆ is the stronger default — still compare pricing and features above before you switch.

More apps to explore