Skip to main content

Nutrition Tracker: Foodnoms vs MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker

At a glance

Key facts for both apps
Attribute
SubtitleLog Food and Track Your MacrosFood Macros Calorie Counter
DeveloperAlgebraic Labs, LLCMacrosFirst, Inc.
App Store rating4.75 (6633 reviews)4.86 (13195 reviews)
PricingFree · 8 in-app purchase option(s)Free · 4 in-app purchase option(s)
TrialNo explicit free trial mentioned in store data.Standard App Store trial terms apply.

Pricing & trial

Pricing comparison
Attribute
SummaryFree · 8 in-app purchase option(s)Free · 4 in-app purchase option(s)
TrialNo explicit free trial mentioned in store data.Standard App Store trial terms apply.

Who each app suits best

Nutrition Tracker: Foodnoms

  • Apple Ecosystem Users — Ideal for those who want a native app that syncs perfectly with iCloud and Health.
  • Macro Trackers — Perfect for users who need precise control over macro and calorie goals.

MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker

Feature checklist

Coverage from our catalog flags. Values are editorial signals, not a guarantee of every device build.

Guide scores

Editorial model scores on our scale — distinct from star ratings in app stores.

Guide score comparison by criterion
Criterion
Overall
Accuracy
Beginner Friendliness
Coachability
Ease Of Use
Feature Depth
Pricing Value
User Feedback

Review themes

Short synthesis of what users often praise or criticize — not a substitute for reading recent reviews yourself.

Highlights users liked

Nutrition Tracker: Foodnoms

Native Apple design; iCloud sync

MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker

Free barcode scanner; Clean, intuitive UI

Common complaints

Nutrition Tracker: Foodnoms

Sync reliability; Repetitive logging steps

MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker

Search engine quality; Missing water tracking

Bottom line

For most people prioritising overall polish and scores in our dataset, Nutrition Tracker: Foodnoms is the stronger default — still compare pricing and features above before you switch.

More apps to explore