Skip to main content

FitBee Calorie & Macro Counter vs MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker

At a glance

Key facts for both apps
Attribute
SubtitleFree, fast, no-ads trackerFood Macros Calorie Counter
DeveloperCortado Labs, LLCMacrosFirst, Inc.
App Store rating4.82 (1507 reviews)4.86 (13195 reviews)
PricingFree · 6 in-app purchase option(s)Free · 4 in-app purchase option(s)
TrialNo explicit trial period mentioned in IAP data.Standard App Store trial terms apply.

Pricing & trial

Pricing comparison
Attribute
SummaryFree · 6 in-app purchase option(s)Free · 4 in-app purchase option(s)
TrialNo explicit trial period mentioned in IAP data.Standard App Store trial terms apply.

Who each app suits best

FitBee Calorie & Macro Counter

  • Efficiency Seekers — Users who want the fastest possible food logging experience.
  • Data Minimalists — Those who prefer a clean, ad-free interface without clutter.

MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker

Feature checklist

Coverage from our catalog flags. Values are editorial signals, not a guarantee of every device build.

Scores

Editorial model scores on our scale — distinct from star ratings in app stores.

Guide score comparison by criterion
Criterion
Overall
Accuracy
Beginner Friendliness
Coachability
Ease Of Use
Feature Depth
Pricing Value
User Feedback

Review themes

Short synthesis of what users often praise or criticize — not a substitute for reading recent reviews yourself.

Highlights users liked

FitBee Calorie & Macro Counter

Efficient logging workflow; Clean UI design

MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker

Free barcode scanner; Clean, intuitive UI

Common complaints

FitBee Calorie & Macro Counter

Lack of pantry feature; No multi-device sync

MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker

Search engine quality; Missing water tracking

Bottom line

For most people prioritising overall polish and scores in our dataset, FitBee Calorie & Macro Counter is the stronger default — still compare pricing and features above before you switch.

More apps to explore