Cronometer: Calorie Counter vs Journable — AI Calorie Counter
At a glance
| Attribute | ||
|---|---|---|
| Subtitle | Nutrition, macro, diet tracker | Diet, Exercise & Macro Tracker |
| Developer | Cronometer Software Inc | Journable LLC |
| App Store rating | 4.77 (88729 reviews) | 4.75 (377 reviews) |
| Pricing | Free · 7 in-app purchase option(s) | Free · 2 in-app purchase option(s) |
| Trial | Free version available with limited features; Gold subscription required for advanced tools. | A free trial is included, allowing for approximately 20 free entries before a subscription is required for unlimited logging and full features. |
Pricing & trial
| Attribute | ||
|---|---|---|
| Summary | Free · 7 in-app purchase option(s) | Free · 2 in-app purchase option(s) |
| Trial | Free version available with limited features; Gold subscription required for advanced tools. | A free trial is included, allowing for approximately 20 free entries before a subscription is required for unlimited logging and full features. |
Who each app suits best
Cronometer: Calorie Counter
- Data-Driven Users — Ideal for those who want precise, verified nutritional data.
- Micronutrient Trackers — Best for users monitoring specific vitamin or mineral deficiencies.
Journable — AI Calorie Counter
- Intuitive Tracking — Individuals seeking an easy-to-use, AI-driven method for logging meals and exercise via chat or photos, avoiding traditional database searches.
- Detailed Nutrition Analysis — Users who require comprehensive tracking of macronutrients and micronutrients, along with AI-powered nutritional insights.
- Accountability & Progress Sharing — People who benefit from tracking their progress with weekly reports and sharing them with external health professionals.
- Global Food Support — Anyone needing support for a wide range of local and international foods, including complex dishes, recognized by AI.
Feature checklist
Coverage from our catalog flags. Values are editorial signals, not a guarantee of every device build.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Photo logging | Yes | Yes |
| Audio / voice logging | No | No |
| AI / natural‑language text logging | No | Yes |
| Barcode scanner | No | No |
| Apple Health | Yes | No |
| Macro tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Micronutrients | Yes | Yes |
| Water tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Workout tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Fasting | Yes | No |
| Coach connection | Yes | Yes |
| Logging accuracy | Yes | Yes |
Guide scores
Editorial model scores on our scale — distinct from star ratings in app stores.
| Criterion | ||
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 9 | 8.5 |
| Accuracy | 10 | 8.3 |
| Beginner Friendliness | 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Coachability | 7.9 | 7.4 |
| Ease Of Use | 9.1 | 8.6 |
| Feature Depth | 9.5 | 9 |
| Pricing Value | 8.2 | 7.7 |
| User Feedback | 9 | 8.5 |
Review themes
Short synthesis of what users often praise or criticize — not a substitute for reading recent reviews yourself.
Highlights users liked
Cronometer: Calorie Counter
Micronutrient tracking; Verified food database
Journable — AI Calorie Counter
Efficiency; Calorie tracking
Common complaints
Cronometer: Calorie Counter
Missing remaining macro totals; Syncing issues
Journable — AI Calorie Counter
Recipe saving; Apple Health integration
Bottom line
For most people prioritising overall polish and scores in our dataset, Cronometer: Calorie Counter is the stronger default — still compare pricing and features above before you switch.