Cronometer: Calorie Counter vs Food AI - Calorie Tracker
At a glance
| Attribute | ||
|---|---|---|
| Subtitle | Nutrition, macro, diet tracker | Fitness & AI Dietician Health |
| Developer | Cronometer Software Inc | CODEPAD YAZILIM VE DIJITAL HIZMETLER LIMITED SIRKETI |
| App Store rating | 4.77 (88729 reviews) | 4.44 (68 reviews) |
| Pricing | Free · 7 in-app purchase option(s) | Free · 7 in-app purchase option(s) |
| Trial | Free version available with limited features; Gold subscription required for advanced tools. | A free trial period may be offered, but any unused portion is forfeited upon subscription purchase. The app description mentions a weekly price of $4.99 and a yearly price of $39.99 for subscriptions. |
Pricing & trial
| Attribute | ||
|---|---|---|
| Summary | Free · 7 in-app purchase option(s) | Free · 7 in-app purchase option(s) |
| Trial | Free version available with limited features; Gold subscription required for advanced tools. | A free trial period may be offered, but any unused portion is forfeited upon subscription purchase. The app description mentions a weekly price of $4.99 and a yearly price of $39.99 for subscriptions. |
Who each app suits best
Cronometer: Calorie Counter
- Data-Driven Users — Ideal for those who want precise, verified nutritional data.
- Micronutrient Trackers — Best for users monitoring specific vitamin or mineral deficiencies.
Food AI - Calorie Tracker
- Visual Food Loggers — Individuals who prefer to log meals by simply taking a photo rather than manual entry.
- Macro-Focused Dieters — Users prioritizing precise tracking of protein, carbohydrates, and fats for their dietary goals.
- Beginners in Nutrition Tracking — Those new to calorie counting who need an intuitive, AI-assisted tool to start.
Feature checklist
Coverage from our catalog flags. Values are editorial signals, not a guarantee of every device build.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Photo logging | Yes | Yes |
| Audio / voice logging | No | No |
| AI / natural‑language text logging | No | No |
| Barcode scanner | No | No |
| Apple Health | Yes | Yes |
| Macro tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Micronutrients | Yes | Yes |
| Water tracking | Yes | No |
| Workout tracking | Yes | No |
| Fasting | Yes | No |
| Coach connection | Yes | No |
| Logging accuracy | Yes | Yes |
Guide scores
Editorial model scores on our scale — distinct from star ratings in app stores.
| Criterion | ||
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 9 | 7 |
| Accuracy | 10 | 6.8 |
| Beginner Friendliness | 8.9 | 6.9 |
| Coachability | 7.9 | 5.9 |
| Ease Of Use | 9.1 | 7.1 |
| Feature Depth | 9.5 | 7.5 |
| Pricing Value | 8.2 | 6.2 |
| User Feedback | 9 | 7 |
Review themes
Short synthesis of what users often praise or criticize — not a substitute for reading recent reviews yourself.
Highlights users liked
Cronometer: Calorie Counter
Micronutrient tracking; Verified food database
Food AI - Calorie Tracker
Ease of Use; Accountability
Common complaints
Cronometer: Calorie Counter
Missing remaining macro totals; Syncing issues
Food AI - Calorie Tracker
Calorie Accuracy
Bottom line
For most people prioritising overall polish and scores in our dataset, Cronometer: Calorie Counter is the stronger default — still compare pricing and features above before you switch.