Cronometer: Calorie Counter vs Fit AI: Calories Tracker
At a glance
| Attribute | ||
|---|---|---|
| Subtitle | Nutrition, macro, diet tracker | Macro & Food Counter |
| Developer | Cronometer Software Inc | BUD TECHNOLOGIES, PTE. LTD. |
| App Store rating | 4.77 (88729 reviews) | 4.75 (962 reviews) |
| Pricing | Free · 7 in-app purchase option(s) | Free · 8 in-app purchase option(s) |
| Trial | Free version available with limited features; Gold subscription required for advanced tools. | A 3-day free trial is offered to access all premium features. |
Pricing & trial
| Attribute | ||
|---|---|---|
| Summary | Free · 7 in-app purchase option(s) | Free · 8 in-app purchase option(s) |
| Trial | Free version available with limited features; Gold subscription required for advanced tools. | A 3-day free trial is offered to access all premium features. |
Who each app suits best
Cronometer: Calorie Counter
- Data-Driven Users — Ideal for those who want precise, verified nutritional data.
- Micronutrient Trackers — Best for users monitoring specific vitamin or mineral deficiencies.
Fit AI: Calories Tracker
- Calorie & Macro Trackers — Ideal for individuals focused on diligently logging and monitoring their daily calorie and macronutrient intake.
- Weight Loss Seekers — Highly effective for users aiming to lose weight, with features for goal setting and progress tracking, supported by positive user results.
- Beginners to Nutrition Tracking — Its user-friendly interface and AI-powered photo logging make it accessible for those new to tracking their diet.
- Visual Food Loggers — Perfect for users who prefer snapping photos of their meals for quick and effortless nutritional analysis.
Feature checklist
Coverage from our catalog flags. Values are editorial signals, not a guarantee of every device build.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Photo logging | Yes | Yes |
| Audio / voice logging | No | No |
| AI / natural‑language text logging | No | No |
| Barcode scanner | No | No |
| Apple Health | Yes | Yes |
| Macro tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Micronutrients | Yes | No |
| Water tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Workout tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Fasting | Yes | No |
| Coach connection | Yes | No |
| Logging accuracy | Yes | Yes |
Guide scores
Editorial model scores on our scale — distinct from star ratings in app stores.
| Criterion | ||
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 9 | 9 |
| Accuracy | 10 | 9 |
| Beginner Friendliness | 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Coachability | 7.9 | 7.9 |
| Ease Of Use | 9.1 | 9 |
| Feature Depth | 9.5 | 9.5 |
| Pricing Value | 8.2 | 8.2 |
| User Feedback | 9 | 9 |
Review themes
Short synthesis of what users often praise or criticize — not a substitute for reading recent reviews yourself.
Highlights users liked
Cronometer: Calorie Counter
Micronutrient tracking; Verified food database
Fit AI: Calories Tracker
Weight Loss Effectiveness; Ease of Use
Common complaints
Cronometer: Calorie Counter
Missing remaining macro totals; Syncing issues
Fit AI: Calories Tracker
—
Bottom line
For most people prioritising overall polish and scores in our dataset, Cronometer: Calorie Counter is the stronger default — still compare pricing and features above before you switch.