Calorie Tracker - CalorieCam vs Calorie Counter by fatsecret
At a glance
| Attribute | ||
|---|---|---|
| Subtitle | Food Nutrition Macro Counter | Diet & Weight Loss Tracker |
| Developer | Wisery Pte. Ltd. | Secret Industries Pty Ltd |
| App Store rating | 4.75 (108 reviews) | 4.77 (13713 reviews) |
| Pricing | Free · 10 in-app purchase option(s) | Free · 7 in-app purchase option(s) |
| Trial | A 3-day free trial is offered to experience the app's features. | No explicit free trial mentioned in store data. |
Pricing & trial
| Attribute | ||
|---|---|---|
| Summary | Free · 10 in-app purchase option(s) | Free · 7 in-app purchase option(s) |
| Trial | A 3-day free trial is offered to experience the app's features. | No explicit free trial mentioned in store data. |
Who each app suits best
Calorie Tracker - CalorieCam
- Effortless Calorie Tracking — Individuals seeking to track calories and macros without manual data entry, leveraging AI image recognition for quick logging.
- Personalized Diet Guidance — Users who benefit from AI-powered coaching, including diet tips, recipe suggestions, and motivational support tailored to their goals.
- Weight Management — Anyone focused on weight loss, muscle gain, or maintenance, with features like calorie deficit tracking, goal setting, and progress monitoring.
- Integrated Fitness Tracking — Users who want to combine nutritional intake with workout logging and net calorie calculations for a holistic view of energy balance.
Calorie Counter by fatsecret
- Budget-conscious trackers — Users who need a comprehensive, ad-free calorie tracker without paying for a subscription.
- Macro-focused dieters — Individuals who prioritize detailed macro breakdowns by meal and day.
- Apple Health users — Those who want seamless data syncing between their fitness apps and Apple Health.
Feature checklist
Coverage from our catalog flags. Values are editorial signals, not a guarantee of every device build.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Photo logging | Yes | Yes |
| Audio / voice logging | Yes | No |
| AI / natural‑language text logging | Yes | Yes |
| Barcode scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Apple Health | Yes | Yes |
| Macro tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Micronutrients | Yes | Yes |
| Water tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Workout tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Fasting | No | Yes |
| Coach connection | Yes | Yes |
| Logging accuracy | Yes | Yes |
Guide scores
Editorial model scores on our scale — distinct from star ratings in app stores.
| Criterion | ||
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 10 | 8 |
| Accuracy | 10 | 7.8 |
| Beginner Friendliness | 10 | 7.9 |
| Coachability | 10 | 6.9 |
| Ease Of Use | 10 | 8.1 |
| Feature Depth | 9.1 | 8.5 |
| Pricing Value | 10 | 7.2 |
| User Feedback | 9.8 | 8 |
Review themes
Short synthesis of what users often praise or criticize — not a substitute for reading recent reviews yourself.
Highlights users liked
Calorie Tracker - CalorieCam
Ease of use; Accuracy of calorie estimates
Calorie Counter by fatsecret
Free feature set; Macro tracking
Common complaints
Calorie Tracker - CalorieCam
Pricing model / Paywall; Subscription management
Calorie Counter by fatsecret
Database inaccuracies; Clunky food entry
Bottom line
For most people prioritising overall polish and scores in our dataset, Calorie Tracker - CalorieCam is the stronger default — still compare pricing and features above before you switch.