Cal AI - Calorie Tracker vs Cronometer: Calorie Counter
At a glance
| Attribute | ||
|---|---|---|
| Subtitle | Food & Macro Counter | Nutrition, macro, diet tracker |
| Developer | Viral Development LLC | Cronometer Software Inc |
| App Store rating | 4.81 (295193 reviews) | 4.77 (88729 reviews) |
| Pricing | Free · 8 in-app purchase option(s) | Free · 7 in-app purchase option(s) |
| Trial | A 3-day free trial is offered for new users, providing access to all premium features. It requires upfront payment information and automatically converts to a paid subscription if not canceled. | Free version available with limited features; Gold subscription required for advanced tools. |
Pricing & trial
| Attribute | ||
|---|---|---|
| Summary | Free · 8 in-app purchase option(s) | Free · 7 in-app purchase option(s) |
| Trial | A 3-day free trial is offered for new users, providing access to all premium features. It requires upfront payment information and automatically converts to a paid subscription if not canceled. | Free version available with limited features; Gold subscription required for advanced tools. |
Who each app suits best
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker
- Quick Calorie & Macro Tracking — Ideal for users who prioritize fast and easy logging of meals using photo recognition or barcode scanning to track calories and macronutrients.
- Weight Management — Suitable for individuals focused on weight loss or gain, leveraging calorie deficit/surplus tracking and visual progress monitoring.
- Social Accountability — Good for users motivated by sharing progress and meals within a community or with friends through in-app groups.
- Basic Health Data Syncing — Beneficial for those who want their nutrition, activity, and weight data to sync seamlessly with Apple Health.
Cronometer: Calorie Counter
- Data-Driven Users — Ideal for those who want precise, verified nutritional data.
- Micronutrient Trackers — Best for users monitoring specific vitamin or mineral deficiencies.
Feature checklist
Coverage from our catalog flags. Values are editorial signals, not a guarantee of every device build.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Photo logging | Yes | Yes |
| Audio / voice logging | No | No |
| AI / natural‑language text logging | No | No |
| Barcode scanner | No | No |
| Apple Health | Yes | Yes |
| Macro tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Micronutrients | Yes | Yes |
| Water tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Workout tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Fasting | Yes | Yes |
| Coach connection | No | Yes |
| Logging accuracy | Yes | Yes |
Guide scores
Editorial model scores on our scale — distinct from star ratings in app stores.
| Criterion | ||
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 8 | 9 |
| Accuracy | 7.8 | 10 |
| Beginner Friendliness | 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Coachability | 6.9 | 7.9 |
| Ease Of Use | 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Feature Depth | 8.5 | 9.5 |
| Pricing Value | 7.2 | 8.2 |
| User Feedback | 8 | 9 |
Review themes
Short synthesis of what users often praise or criticize — not a substitute for reading recent reviews yourself.
Highlights users liked
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker
Efficient Food Logging; Macro Customization
Cronometer: Calorie Counter
Micronutrient tracking; Verified food database
Common complaints
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker
Accuracy Issues; Workout Logging Limitations
Cronometer: Calorie Counter
Missing remaining macro totals; Syncing issues
Bottom line
For most people prioritising overall polish and scores in our dataset, Cronometer: Calorie Counter is the stronger default — still compare pricing and features above before you switch.