Skip to main content
Calorie Tracker Guide

BiteTracker: Calories & Macros

Track Foods with AI

Individuals seeking AI-powered food and macro trackingUsers who prioritize simplicity and ease of useThose needing recipe management and meal planning assistancePeople looking for an ad-free experience
4.7· 36 App Store ratings

Editorial review

Method healthier-v1: weighted blend of 9 data-derived sub-scores; see scoring.md.

Read the review

Goal fit

How well this app matches common goals (0–10 from our enrichment). Higher means a stronger match.

  • Weight loss9.0/10
  • Body recomposition8.5/10
  • Calorie awareness8.5/10
  • Consistency8.5/10
  • Fat loss8.5/10
  • General health8.5/10
  • Habit building8.5/10
  • Macro tracking8.5/10
  • Meal planning8.5/10
  • Nutrition education8.5/10
  • Weight maintenance8.5/10
  • Muscle gain8.0/10

Who is it for?

Notes from our editorial team.

Best for

  • •Individuals seeking AI-powered food and macro tracking — The app's core strength lies in its AI for quick food recognition, logging, and personalized nutritional consultations.
  • •Users who prioritize simplicity and ease of use — Many reviews highlight the app's straightforward interface and efficient logging process, making it accessible for daily use.
  • •Those needing recipe management and meal planning assistance — Features like importing recipes from URLs, a built-in recipe book, and AI-assisted meal planning are prominent and well-received.
  • •People looking for an ad-free experience — The app explicitly states it provides a 100% ad-free environment, enhancing the user experience.

Less ideal for

  • •Users requiring precise micronutrient tracking — The app focuses on calories and macronutrients, with no explicit features for detailed micronutrient analysis.
  • •Individuals who rely heavily on Apple Watch integration for logging — User reviews indicate a lack of direct Apple Watch sync functionality for tracking.
  • •Those needing advanced workout log syncing with Apple Health — While steps sync, comprehensive workout log integration with Apple Health is not fully confirmed and has been a user request.
  • •Users unwilling to pay for core functionality — The app transitioned from a free model to a paid subscription, which may not suit users seeking a completely free solution.

Review themes

Recurring topics in App Store reviews—what people praise vs. what frustrates them.

Users consistently praise BiteTracker for its intuitive interface, AI-powered food recognition, and comprehensive macro/calorie tracking. The app's simplicity, ad-free experience, and robust recipe management features are frequently highlighted as superior to competitors. Common complaints include a recent transition from a free to a paid model, various functional glitches (e.g., zeroed-out logs, inconsistent serving conversions), and limitations in Apple Health syncing, particularly the lack of workout log integration and Apple Watch support. Some users also noted occasional inaccuracies in calorie calculations.

Liked themes

  • Ease of use and simplicity

    Users find the app very easy to navigate, user-friendly, and less overwhelming than other tracking apps, making consistent logging achievable.

    ~8 mentions

  • AI-powered features

    The AI tools for food recognition, logging analysis, and consultation are highly valued for their power and effectiveness in providing insights and tips.

    ~10 mentions

  • Recipe management and planning

    The ability to find, import from URLs, save, and manage recipes, along with AI-assisted meal planning, is a significant positive for users.

    ~5 mentions

  • Effectiveness for progress

    The app is effective in helping users track progress, build habits, and gain a clearer picture of their macro and calorie intake to meet goals.

    ~5 mentions

  • Ad-free experience

    Users appreciate the 100% ad-free environment, contributing to a smoother and more focused tracking experience.

    ~2 mentions

  • Grocery ordering integration

    The integration with grocery services like Instacart for ordering recipe ingredients is seen as a helpful and convenient feature.

    ~2 mentions

  • Robust food database

    The app's extensive food database, including niche dietary items, is praised for reducing the need for manual input.

    ~1 mentions

Disliked themes

  • Transition to paid model

    Some users expressed disappointment over the app becoming a paid service after initially being free.

    ~2 mentions

  • Functional glitches and bugs

    Users reported various glitches, such as the app sometimes opening to a zeroed-out log or general functionality issues.

    ~4 mentions

  • Limited syncing capabilities

    Complaints include a lack of Apple Watch sync and incomplete Apple Health integration, specifically regarding workout logs.

    ~3 mentions

  • Accuracy of logging and calculations

    Some users found calorie calculations incorrect or serving size conversions unintuitive, requiring manual adjustments.

    ~3 mentions

  • Beginner friendliness

    One user noted the app might not be very beginner-friendly, suggesting features like BMI calculation could improve accessibility.

    ~1 mentions

Editorial guide score

Our independent score for BiteTracker: Calories & Macros—based on features, pricing, and feedback themes.

Score breakdown

  • Accuracy4.5/10

    Quality rating of the accuracy feature (5 if unknown).

  • Pricing value10.0/10

    10 - annualised price $0.00/15 (+0.5 if free trial).

  • Ease of use9.0/10

    5 + 5 x best quality of fast-logging features (AI image/text/audio, barcode).

  • Feature depth7.5/10

    Quality-weighted share of tracked features available (excellent 1.0 .. poor 0.2), x1.6, capped at 10.

  • Beginner friendliness9.4/10

    60% easeOfUse + 40% beginner skill-level fit.

  • User feedback6.4/10

    Bayesian rating 4.34 (iOS 4.67x36 + Play 4.18x26, prior 4.3x200) + review stars sentiment +0.80 over 20 reviews.

  • Maintenance7.7/10

    Last release 36 days ago (half-life 90d, 70%) + median 8 days between releases (30%).

  • Traction3.0/10

    log10 of 62 total ratings (iOS+Play), 1M ratings = 10.

  • Coachability10.0/10

    Best quality of aiCoach / coachConnection features.

Also in the guide

Send a correction if a price, feature, or verdict on this page is wrong. It is emailed privately and is not published.

Pricing & trials

Store listing

Free

Trial

A free trial period is likely offered before requiring a premium subscription for full functionality.

Features we track

Click to see all apps that support this feature.

  • Photo loggingYes

    good · moderate · Uses AI-powered food recognition via camera scan to log meals. Some users report issues with serving size conversions.

    description screenshots

  • Audio loggingNo
  • Text loggingYes

    good · strong · Allows logging meals by describing them with AI assistance and smart search. Users praise its ease of use.

    description reviews

  • Barcode scannerNo
  • Apple HealthYes

    good · moderate · Integrates with Apple Health to import steps data and sync data to Apple Health. Some users desire more comprehensive syncing, such as workout logs.

    description reviews

  • Macro trackingYes

    excellent · strong · Automatically tracks calories, protein, carbs, and fats, with personalized targets.

    description screenshots

  • MicronutrientsNo
  • Water trackingYes

    good · moderate · Includes built-in water tracking functionality.

    description

  • Workout trackingYes

    good · strong · Allows users to track workouts and daily activity.

    description reviews

  • FastingNo
  • Coach connectionNo
  • Accuracy focusYes

    mixed · moderate · While the app aims for accuracy, some users report issues with calorie calculation and serving size conversions, requiring manual adjustments.

    reviews

Screenshots

Explore more — apps to consider if you are switching.